I hadn't seen this picture before until Richard Dawkins re-tweeted it with a link to a sharp rebuttal from a believer. The post Riding with Richard in the Land of Atheist Devotion caught my attention. Unlike most rebuttals that are shrill, this one is measured. But more importantly, it's clear to me after reading it, it comes on the back of contemplation. I so wish debates around religion were as measured as this.
The reason I say that is because until some time ago, I was one of those firmly ensconced in the Dawkins camp. The kinds who believed religious advocacy can only be countered by militant atheism.
Over time though, I've tempered down. My belief in science, reason and logic remains unchanged. To that extent, I am still a believer in the Dawkins school of questioning everything. That said, the more I think of it, militant atheism is as fundamentalist as staunch beliefs held by any religious sects.
That is why I find myself someplace in between. The sweet spot for me was articulated by Alain de Botton